Thread:Shuckle*/@comment-24922980-20140723005012/@comment-7929322-20140723165535

No, you don't have good skills. All of your rebuttals have fallen apart because of no flow or real structure. I estimate your real age to be about 11-12, because of your poor writing abilities and reading comprehension. I did not start this argument, as you contacted me first with your irrational request. You basically said "Please halt everything for my poor, sick brother so he can get his shiny internet badge." This is definently an irrational claim, since you had already pushed the deadline so far. And I think you have bad skills because, again, your arguments have no real structure or weight. You just keep making strange claims and even went as far to lie about your age to make yourself seem better. A 17 year old is much more rational than that. Calling me rude is another dectector of your age, as you've constantly used this over and over again, with no real solid evidence of me being rude.

As I said, I'm a realist, and if you and your brother are really 16 and 17, you would know that you're no special snowflake, and that everything isn't going to halt just for you. Just to scale, I'm 14, so if you are really 17, you'd probably have better debating skills than me, which they teach in at least decent schools. You clearly don't have better debating skills than me, since you just try to cover up your irrational claims with strange comprehensions of what I wrote and even blatantly showing that you just didn't read my message. If you are truly 17, you'd be looking at colleges right now, and, news flash, colleges want people who can construct sentences and paragraphs with a flow to them. Either you're about 11 or 12, or you're just a very poorly taught 17 year old.